Emeli Chatterjee

534 citations
26 papers · 284 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Emeli Chatterjee

18 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Emeli Chatterjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cancer Research 52
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 76
  • Molecular Biology 148
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 12
Replace Anusha N. Seneviratne with:
Anusha N. Seneviratne United Kingdom
Taohong Hu China
Cong Lan China
Rayane Brinck Teixeira Brazil
Michiel Algoet Belgium
Matic Pusovnik Belgium
Maoping Chu China
Ritwik Datta India
Kar Sheng Lew New Zealand
Emeli Chatterjee relative to Anusha N. Seneviratne United Kingdom Anusha N. Seneviratne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Anusha N. Seneviratne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emeli Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emeli Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emeli Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emeli Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emeli Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emeli Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emeli Chatterjee. The network helps show where Emeli Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emeli Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emeli Chatterjee Line = papers co-authored together Emeli Chatterjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201748
2 202147
3 202437
4 201529
5 202323
6 201820
7 202317
8 202316
9 202411
10 20239
11 20198
12 20235
13 20234
14 20233
15 20242
16 20222
17 20162
18 20251
19 20250
20 20250

About Emeli Chatterjee

Emeli Chatterjee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Cancer Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (4 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (4 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Circular RNAs in diseases (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (52 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (76 citations), Molecular Biology (148 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (12 citations). Emeli Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Guoping Li, Junjie Xiao, Sagartirtha Sarkar, Xue Pan, Juan Gao, Bishwajit Kundu, Santanu Rana, Shantanu Sengupta, Mamta Chawla‐Sarkar and Arjun Ray. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, Basic Research in Cardiology, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease and Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact