Emeli Chatterjee

668 citations
36 papers · 444 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emeli Chatterjee

32 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Emeli Chatterjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 97
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 34
  • Molecular Biology 212
  • Cancer Research 45
  • Aging 4
Replace Michail Spanos with:
Michail Spanos United States
Chengzhi Lu China
Moon Hwa Hong South Korea
Priyanka Gokulnath United States
Sanya Haiaty Iran
Lucas Dailey United States
Anastasia Familtseva United States
Geer Tian China
Yanting Wang China
Nadine Biesemann Germany
Emeli Chatterjee relative to Michail Spanos United States Michail Spanos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Michail Spanos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emeli Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emeli Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emeli Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emeli Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emeli Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emeli Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emeli Chatterjee. The network helps show where Emeli Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emeli Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emeli Chatterjee Line = papers co-authored together Emeli Chatterjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202156
2 202454
3 201753
4 201533
5 202332
6 202324
7 202323
8 201822
9 202319
10 202419
11 202414
12 202312
13 202412
14 202510
15 20198
16 20247
17 20236
18 20256
19 20234
20 20244

About Emeli Chatterjee

Emeli Chatterjee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Biomaterials and Cell Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (9 papers), Congenital heart defects research (4 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (4 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (3 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (97 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (34 citations), Molecular Biology (212 citations), Cancer Research (45 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Emeli Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Guoping Li, Junjie Xiao, Sagartirtha Sarkar, Xue Pan, Juan Gao, Saumya Das, Michail Spanos, Priyanka Gokulnath, Santanu Rana and Bishwajit Kundu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, Basic Research in Cardiology, Frontiers in Medicine and Materials & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact