Emanuel Moss

27 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Emanuel Moss
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Health Informatics 78
  • Space and Planetary Science 81
  • Safety Research 332
  • Geology 94
  • Conservation 40
Replace Nanna Bonde Thylstrup with:
Nanna Bonde Thylstrup Denmark
Geoffrey Rockwell Canada
Elizabeth Lomas United Kingdom
Aleksandra Urman Switzerland
Mark Freeman Australia
Hyun-Kyung Lee South Korea
John Zerilli United Kingdom
Cory Knobel United States
Matthew J. Bietz United States
Michael Madaio United States
Emanuel Moss relative to Nanna Bonde Thylstrup Denmark Nanna Bonde Thylstrup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.8×
Nanna Bonde Thylstrup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuel Moss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuel Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuel Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuel Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuel Moss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuel Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuel Moss. The network helps show where Emanuel Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emanuel Moss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emanuel Moss Line = papers co-authored together Emanuel Moss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015145
2 2021104
3 202264
4 201958
5 202249
6 202246
7 202146
8 201942
9 202028
10 202226
11 202123
12 202018
13 202115
14 202213
15 20249
16 20239
17
Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts
20209
18 20209
19 20209
20 20208

About Emanuel Moss

Emanuel Moss is a scholar working on Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Health Informatics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (20 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (3 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (78 citations), Space and Planetary Science (81 citations), Safety Research (332 citations), Geology (94 citations) and Conservation (40 citations). Emanuel Moss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Metcalf, Mona Sloane, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Ranjit Singh, Madeleine Clare Elish, Christopher H. Roosevelt, Helen Nissenbaum, A. Feder Cooper, Rumman Chowdhury and danah boyd. Their work appears in journals such as Patterns, Nature Machine Intelligence, American Ethnologist, Journal of Field Archaeology and Journal of Cultural Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact