Eman Amin

1.4k citations
46 papers · 1.1k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Eman Amin

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Eman Amin
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 905
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 787
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 132
  • Developmental Neuroscience 102
  • Sensory Systems 99
Replace Mathieu M. Albasser with:
Mathieu M. Albasser United Kingdom
Mathieu Wolff France
Štěpán Kubík Czechia
Natalie Cappaert Netherlands
Adrian J. Duszkiewicz United Kingdom
Han Xu China
N.M. van Strien Netherlands
Michael Anderson Ireland
Bennet Givens United States
Monique Majchrzak France
Eman Amin relative to Mathieu M. Albasser United Kingdom Mathieu M. Albasser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mathieu M. Albasser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eman Amin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eman Amin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eman Amin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eman Amin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eman Amin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eman Amin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eman Amin. The network helps show where Eman Amin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eman Amin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eman Amin Line = papers co-authored together Eman Amin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004109
2 200465
3 201064
4 200264
5 200859
6 200150
7 201245
8 200241
9 201734
10 201133
11 201232
12 201132
13 201632
14 200631
15 201531
16 200330
17 200727
18 200526
19 200826
20 202025

About Eman Amin

Eman Amin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (40 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (35 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (905 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (787 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (132 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (102 citations) and Sensory Systems (99 citations). Eman Amin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Egypt and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John P. Aggleton, Trisha A. Jenkins, Mathieu M. Albasser, Guillaume L. Poirier, Malcolm W. Brown, Cristian M. Olarte‐Sánchez, Rebecca Dias, Lisa Kinnavane, Seralynne D. Vann and John M. Pearce. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Neuroscience, Behavioural Brain Research and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact