Els de Graauw

1.3k citations
38 papers · 787 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Els de Graauw

34 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers

Els de Graauw
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Public Administration 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 667
  • Communication 75
  • Clinical Psychology 169
  • Demography 97
Replace Blanca Garcés‐Mascareñas with:
Blanca Garcés‐Mascareñas Spain
Grete Brochmann Norway
Shannon Gleeson United States
Arjen Leerkes Netherlands
Kathleen Valtonen Finland
Jean‐Michel Lafleur Belgium
Anna Boucher Australia
Saskia Bonjour Netherlands
Rob C. Mawby United Kingdom
Giuseppe Sciortino Italy
Els de Graauw relative to Blanca Garcés‐Mascareñas Spain Blanca Garcés‐Mascareñas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Blanca Garcés‐Mascareñas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Els de Graauw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Els de Graauw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Els de Graauw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Els de Graauw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Els de Graauw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Els de Graauw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Els de Graauw. The network helps show where Els de Graauw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Els de Graauw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Els de Graauw Line = papers co-authored together Els de Graauw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016122
2 2015113
3 201373
4 201466
5 201659
6
Making Immigrant Rights Real: Nonprofits and the Politics of Integration in San Francisco
201632
7 201729
8 201629
9 202027
10 201327
11 201723
12 202220
13 202319
14 201518
15 201217
16 201315
17 201515
18 202012
19 202110
20 201910

About Els de Graauw

Els de Graauw is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Demography, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (23 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (19 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (8 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (5 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (667 citations), Communication (75 citations), Clinical Psychology (169 citations) and Demography (97 citations). Els de Graauw has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Irene Bloemraad, Floris Vermeulen, Shannon Gleeson, Erik Bleich, Michael Jones‐Correa, Rebecca Hamlin and Tiziana Caponio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Territory Politics Governance, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Antipode and Social Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact