Eloise Radcliffe

500 citations
19 papers · 298 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Eloise Radcliffe

19 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Eloise Radcliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Rehabilitation 63
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 30
  • Dermatology 60
  • Epidemiology 46
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 19
Replace Joshua Biber with:
Joshua Biber United States
Mohammad Sahebkar Iran
Connie Ziegler Denmark
Ravishankar Ramaswamy United States
Indira Natarajan United Kingdom
Bedilu Deribe Ethiopia
Bethany Myers United States
Dorien De Meyer Belgium
Austin D. Chen United States
Natasha E. Lane Canada
Eloise Radcliffe relative to Joshua Biber United States Joshua Biber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Joshua Biber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eloise Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eloise Radcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eloise Radcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eloise Radcliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eloise Radcliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eloise Radcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eloise Radcliffe. The network helps show where Eloise Radcliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eloise Radcliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eloise Radcliffe Line = papers co-authored together Eloise Radcliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201176
2 202341
3 201336
4 201430
5 201530
6 201327
7 201813
8 202111
9 20176
10 20175
11 20205
12 20254
13 20253
14 20253
15 20203
16 20172
17 20231
18 20241
19
Understanding and characterising the value and role of self-management support for people living with cancer that is treatable but not curable: The ENABLE study
20201

About Eloise Radcliffe

Eloise Radcliffe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Oncology, Dermatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (3 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (2 papers), Dental Health and Care Utilization (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (63 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (30 citations), Dermatology (60 citations), Epidemiology (46 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (19 citations). Eloise Radcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Christopher McKevitt, Charles Wolfe, Euan Sadler, Fiona Child, Lucy Selman, Sean Whittaker, Richard Harding, T Beynon, Karen Lowton and Myfanwy Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, BMC Geriatrics, PLoS ONE, Drugs & Aging and Sociology of Health & Illness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact