Ellis E. Douek

1.1k citations
40 papers · 848 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ellis E. Douek

37 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Ellis E. Douek
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Sensory Systems 453
  • Otorhinolaryngology 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 202
  • Speech and Hearing 26
  • Neurology 28
Replace Bengt Barr with:
Bengt Barr Sweden
Ralph F. Naunton United States
E Lehnhardt Germany
André Luiz Lopes Sampaio Brazil
Ronen Perez Israel
Patrick Zorowka Austria
Isabelle Rouillon France
Dietrich Plester Germany
John T. Jacobson United States
Reijo K. Johansson Finland
Ellis E. Douek relative to Bengt Barr Sweden Bengt Barr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Bengt Barr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellis E. Douek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellis E. Douek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellis E. Douek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellis E. Douek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellis E. Douek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellis E. Douek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellis E. Douek. The network helps show where Ellis E. Douek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ellis E. Douek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellis E. Douek Line = papers co-authored together Ellis E. Douek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980119
2 197993
3 197672
4 198956
5 198849
6 197548
7 198346
8 196839
9 197336
10 198230
11 199429
12 197726
13 199424
14
The sense of smell and its abnormalities
197422
15 198717
16 198315
17 198414
18 196713
19 197413
20 198613

About Ellis E. Douek

Ellis E. Douek is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (21 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (1 paper), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (1 paper) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (453 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (127 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (202 citations), Speech and Hearing (26 citations) and Neurology (28 citations). Ellis E. Douek has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hilary C. Dodson, L. H. Bannister, Keith N. Humphries, Adrian J. Fourcin, Stuart Rosen, William P. R. Gibson, Brian C. J. Moore, John Zamet, Evelyn Abberton and David M. Howard. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact