Elliot Moore

934 citations
42 papers · 624 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Elliot Moore

38 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Elliot Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 297
  • Signal Processing 162
  • Pharmacy 52
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Artificial Intelligence 235
Replace Kirsty Smith with:
Kirsty Smith United Kingdom
Mark Huckvale United Kingdom
Shona D’Arcy Ireland
Marilyn K. Silverman United States
Stephen E. Silverman United States
Klára Vicsi Hungary
Heidi Christensen United Kingdom
Daniel Bone United States
Maurice Gerczuk Germany
Brian S. Helfer United States
Elliot Moore relative to Kirsty Smith United Kingdom Kirsty Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kirsty Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elliot Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elliot Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliot Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliot Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elliot Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliot Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliot Moore. The network helps show where Elliot Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elliot Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elliot Moore Line = papers co-authored together Elliot Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007162
2 201750
3 200548
4 200933
5 200432
6 200430
7 201729
8 202329
9 200426
10 201619
11 200815
12 201014
13 201614
14 201814
15 200813
16 200712
17 201710
18 19978
19 20087
20 20216

About Elliot Moore

Elliot Moore is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 42 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis (14 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (13 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (10 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (10 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (7 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (6 papers) and Music and Audio Processing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (297 citations), Signal Processing (162 citations), Pharmacy (52 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (235 citations). Elliot Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include John W. Peifer, M. Clements, Mark A. Clements, Maysam Ghovanloo, Temiloluwa Prioleau, Rui Sun, Jacqueline Laures‐Gore, Scott Russell, Rupal Patel and Vince D. Calhoun. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Speech Communication and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact