Elizabeth Stratton

908 citations
24 papers · 517 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Elizabeth Stratton

21 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Stratton
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Applied Psychology 92
  • Clinical Psychology 119
  • General Health Professions 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 35
  • Conservation 8
Replace Emma Lawrance with:
Emma Lawrance United Kingdom
D. Rex Billington New Zealand
Line Tremblay Canada
Megan Whitehead United States
Holly N. Fitzgerald United States
Giacomo Bignardi United Kingdom
Paul D. Creswell United States
Astrid F. Junghans Netherlands
Sonja Gilbert Finland
Joanne Durkin Australia
Elizabeth Stratton relative to Emma Lawrance United Kingdom Emma Lawrance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Emma Lawrance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Stratton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Stratton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Stratton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Stratton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Stratton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Stratton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Stratton. The network helps show where Elizabeth Stratton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Stratton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elizabeth Stratton Line = papers co-authored together Elizabeth Stratton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017186
2 202067
3 201540
4 202129
5 202227
6 201925
7 201821
8 202120
9 201515
10 202114
11 202414
12 201710
13 20209
14 20209
15 20228
16 20237
17 20226
18 20214
19 20243
20 20202

About Elizabeth Stratton

Elizabeth Stratton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Ecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Marine animal studies overview (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (92 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), General Health Professions (114 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (35 citations) and Conservation (8 citations). Elizabeth Stratton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nick Glozier, Samuel B. Harvey, Isabella Choi, Rafael A. Calvo, Amit Lampit, Jennifer Taylor, Loyola McLean, Anthony Korner, Ian B. Hickie and John Torous. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, PLoS ONE, Education and Treatment of Children, BMC Veterinary Research and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact