Eliot Bolduc

1.4k citations
23 papers · 948 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Eliot Bolduc

22 papers receiving 890 citations

Peers

Eliot Bolduc
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 65
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 801
  • Artificial Intelligence 373
  • Spectroscopy 98
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 67
Replace Takahiro Kuga with:
Takahiro Kuga Japan
J. Banerji India
Yoshio Torii Japan
Reeta Vyas United States
Boris Hage Germany
Aidan S. Arnold United Kingdom
Onur Hosten United States
Shuichiro Inoue Japan
Akihisa Goban United States
Emma E. Wollman United States
Eliot Bolduc relative to Takahiro Kuga Japan Takahiro Kuga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Takahiro Kuga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eliot Bolduc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliot Bolduc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliot Bolduc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliot Bolduc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliot Bolduc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliot Bolduc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliot Bolduc. The network helps show where Eliot Bolduc may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eliot Bolduc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eliot Bolduc Line = papers co-authored together Eliot Bolduc links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013231
2 2013146
3 2015142
4 201474
5 201256
6 197248
7 197344
8 201840
9 197139
10 201626
11 197325
12 201419
13 197216
14 201411
15 201710
16 19757
17 19755
18 19783
19 19753
20 20161

About Eliot Bolduc

Eliot Bolduc is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Instrumentation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (9 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (5 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (3 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (65 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (801 citations), Artificial Intelligence (373 citations), Spectroscopy (98 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (67 citations). Eliot Bolduc has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Boyd, Jonathan Leach, P. Marmet, Ebrahim Karimi, Enrico Santamato, Megan Agnew, Jeff Z. Salvail, Allan S. Johnson, Daniele Faccio and Daniel J. Gauthier. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Nature Communications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Scientific Reports and Optics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact