Elham Bidar

1.7k citations
73 papers · 795 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Elham Bidar

67 papers receiving 788 citations

Peers

Elham Bidar
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 444
  • Emergency Medicine 61
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 98
  • Internal Medicine 10
  • Surgery 126
Replace Mark R. Bonnell with:
Mark R. Bonnell United States
Linrui Guo Canada
Naoyoshi Aoyama Japan
Ali İhsan Parlar Türkiye
Hynek Říha Czechia
Ulrich Schurr Switzerland
Kasim Oguz Coskun Germany
Hajime Imura Japan
Francis X. Downey United States
David Zemánek Czechia
Elham Bidar relative to Mark R. Bonnell United States Mark R. Bonnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Mark R. Bonnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elham Bidar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elham Bidar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elham Bidar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elham Bidar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elham Bidar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elham Bidar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elham Bidar. The network helps show where Elham Bidar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elham Bidar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elham Bidar Line = papers co-authored together Elham Bidar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201479
2 202170
3 202053
4 201537
5 202030
6 202330
7 202230
8 201928
9 201427
10 201826
11 202425
12
In-hospital outcome of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients: the 2007-2017 Maastricht experience.
201721
13 201321
14 202120
15 202219
16 202318
17 201818
18 202117
19 202015
20 201911

About Elham Bidar

Elham Bidar is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (30 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (18 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (9 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (8 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers) and Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (444 citations), Emergency Medicine (61 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (98 citations), Internal Medicine (10 citations) and Surgery (126 citations). Elham Bidar has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jos G. Maessen, Bart Maesen, Ulrich Schotten, Sander Verheule, Ali Gharaviri, Ehsan Natour, Roberto Lorusso, Samuel Heuts, Stef Zeemering and Dominik Linz. Their work appears in journals such as EP Europace, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology and Heart Rhythm.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact