Ela Bhatt
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Neurology top 10%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Papers in
-
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 3
- Motor Control and Adaptation 2
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 2
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 1
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 3
- Co-authors
- James R. Carey (7 shared papers)Scott M. Lewis (2 shared papers)William K. Durfee (2 shared papers)K.M. Anderson (1 shared paper)Jennifer Steele (2 shared papers)Teresa J. Kimberley (1 shared paper)David C. Anderson (1 shared paper)Álvaro Pascual‐Leone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (3 papers)Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience (1 paper)Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (1 paper)Experimental Brain Research (1 paper)World Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Ela Bhatt
10 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Rehabilitation 199
- Neurology 113
- Cognitive Neuroscience 94
- Neurology 55
- Psychiatry and Mental health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Ela Bhatt
This map shows the geographic impact of Ela Bhatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ela Bhatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ela Bhatt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ela Bhatt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ela Bhatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ela Bhatt. The network helps show where Ela Bhatt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ela Bhatt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity. | 2005 | 128 |
| 2 | 2007 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 0 |
About Ela Bhatt
Ela Bhatt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Neurology, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 11 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper), Color perception and design (1 paper) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (199 citations), Neurology (113 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations), Neurology (55 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (52 citations). Ela Bhatt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include James R. Carey, Scott M. Lewis, William K. Durfee, K.M. Anderson, Jennifer Steele, Teresa J. Kimberley, David C. Anderson, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Ovidiu Lungu and Edward J. Auerbach. Their work appears in journals such as Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, Experimental Brain Research and World Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.