E.J. Duke
Impact in
-
- Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
- Insect Science top 10%
Papers in
-
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 4
- Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders 4
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 3
- Ecology 7
- Physiological and biochemical adaptations 3
- Co-authors
- Edward Glassman (6 shared papers)Canice Nolan (3 shared papers)James F. Collins (3 shared papers)Rosalie K. Crouch (2 shared papers)P. Joyce (4 shared papers)Ruth M. Hamill (1 shared paper)E.M. PANTELOURIS (2 shared papers)David G. Priest (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biochemical Genetics (4 papers)Genetics Research (2 papers)Heredity (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)Experimental Eye Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
E.J. Duke
29 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 85
- Insect Science 53
- Ecology 97
- Genetics 101
- Nutrition and Dietetics 54
Countries citing papers authored by E.J. Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of E.J. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.J. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.J. Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.J. Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.J. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.J. Duke. The network helps show where E.J. Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.J. Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 46 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1984 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1971 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1963 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 5 |
About E.J. Duke
E.J. Duke is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Insect Science, Nephrology and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (4 papers), Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders (4 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (85 citations), Insect Science (53 citations), Ecology (97 citations), Genetics (101 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (54 citations). E.J. Duke has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward Glassman, Canice Nolan, James F. Collins, Rosalie K. Crouch, P. Joyce, Ruth M. Hamill, E.M. PANTELOURIS, David G. Priest, James P. Ryan and T. Michael Redmond. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Genetics, Genetics Research, Heredity, Nature and Experimental Eye Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.