Ehsan-Ul Haq

454 citations
23 papers · 143 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ehsan-Ul Haq

19 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

Ehsan-Ul Haq
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Communication 36
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 25
  • Information Systems 34
  • Computer Science Applications 8
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 2
Replace Lena Clever with:
Lena Clever Germany
Dennis Assenmacher Germany
Giridhari Venkatadri Germany
Oana Goga France
Ratan Dey United States
Louis Yu United States
Isa Inuwa-Dutse United Kingdom
Kaitlyn Zhou United States
Yiqing Hua United States
Drew Conway United States
Ehsan-Ul Haq relative to Lena Clever Germany Lena Clever's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lena Clever · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ehsan-Ul Haq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ehsan-Ul Haq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ehsan-Ul Haq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ehsan-Ul Haq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ehsan-Ul Haq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ehsan-Ul Haq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ehsan-Ul Haq. The network helps show where Ehsan-Ul Haq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Ehsan-Ul Haq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ehsan-Ul Haq Line = papers co-authored together Ehsan-Ul Haq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201824
2 202024
3 201910
4 20229
5 20199
6 20228
7 20228
8 20208
9 20227
10 20226
11 20225
12 20205
13 20244
14 20244
15 20224
16 20232
17 20232
18 20222
19 20251
20 20181

About Ehsan-Ul Haq

Ehsan-Ul Haq is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 143 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (3 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (36 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (25 citations), Information Systems (34 citations), Computer Science Applications (8 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (2 citations). Ehsan-Ul Haq has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Finland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Pan Hui, Tristan Braud, Young D. Kwon, Gareth Tyson, Dimitris Chatzopoulos, Lik‐Hang Lee, Yong Li, Carlos Bermejo, Reza Hadi Mogavi and Xiaojuan Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, IEEE Access, IEEE Communications Magazine and Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact