Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
1.6k papers
receiving
37.7k citations
Peers
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
Human-Computer Interaction8.4k
Applied Psychology2.1k
Signal Processing4.7k
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition9.0k
Transportation1.9k
Replace Personal and Ubiquitous Computing with:
Personal and Ubiquitous ComputingUnited States
IEEE Pervasive ComputingUnited States
IEEE Intelligent SystemsUnited States
Behaviour and Information TechnologyUnited States
International Journal of Human-Computer StudiesUnited States
Telematics and InformaticsUnited States
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionUnited States
Pervasive and Mobile ComputingUnited States
ACM Transactions on Information SystemsChina
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and HumansUnited States
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologiesrelative toPersonal and Ubiquitous ComputingUnited StatesPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing · 1×
×0.48k/19kHI
×1.22k/2kAP
×1.25k/4kSP
×0.49k/20kCVPR
×0.42k/5kTRANS
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.
About Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
The 1.7k papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies in the last decades have received a total of 38.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (457 papers), Signal Processing (238 papers), Transportation (136 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (433 papers) and Applied Psychology (90 papers) specifically the topics of Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies (294 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (225 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (212 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (167 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (148 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (136 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (126 papers) and Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies are Daqing Zhang, Jie Xiong, Thomas Plötz, Yu Guan, Dan Wu, Youwei Zeng, Tao Gu, Ruiyang Gao, Yong Li and Uichin Lee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.