Edwin John Matthews

49 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Edwin John Matthews
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Chemical Health and Safety 51
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 845
  • Small Animals 294
  • Cancer Research 524
  • Pharmacology 268
Replace Rachel L Benz with:
Rachel L Benz United States
Naomi L. Kruhlak United States
Carol A. Marchant United Kingdom
Kevin P. Cross United States
Laura L. Custer United States
Robert A. Jolly United States
Krista L. Dobo United States
Jacky Van Gompel Belgium
Joel P. Bercu United States
Ans Punt Netherlands
Edwin John Matthews relative to Rachel L Benz United States Rachel L Benz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rachel L Benz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin John Matthews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin John Matthews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin John Matthews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin John Matthews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin John Matthews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin John Matthews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin John Matthews. The network helps show where Edwin John Matthews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edwin John Matthews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin John Matthews Line = papers co-authored together Edwin John Matthews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998121
2 2005111
3 200386
4 200681
5 200580
6 200478
7 200476
8 199376
9 200868
10 200965
11 200959
12 200655
13 200752
14 200552
15 200941
16 200741
17 200940
18 200838
19 198435
20 200432

About Edwin John Matthews

Edwin John Matthews is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Small Animals, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Toxicology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (19 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (12 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (6 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers) and Chemical Safety and Risk Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (51 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (845 citations), Small Animals (294 citations), Cancer Research (524 citations) and Pharmacology (268 citations). Edwin John Matthews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph F. Contrera, Rachel L Benz, Naomi L. Kruhlak, Judson W. Spalding, Raymond W. Tennant, Michael C. Cimino, Gilles Klopman, Rajeshwar P. Verma, Chihae Yang and Roland Benz. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Environmental Health Perspectives, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews and Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact