Edwin Emery

455 citations
19 papers · 251 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Emery

16 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

Edwin Emery
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Communication 110
  • Literature and Literary Theory 31
  • Philosophy 24
  • Sociology and Political Science 94
  • Marketing 19
Replace Edward L. Bernays with:
Edward L. Bernays United States
Gerald J. Baldasty United States
Douglass Cater
John Tebbel United States
Richard Fitchen United States
Andrew K. Semmel United States
Mark E. Kann United States
T. Desmond Morrow Canada
David Paul Nord United States
Michèle Mattelart Chile
Edwin Emery relative to Edward L. Bernays United States Edward L. Bernays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Edward L. Bernays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Emery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Emery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Emery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Emery. The network helps show where Edwin Emery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Emery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Emery Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Emery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
The press and America: An interpretative history of the mass media
1978100
2
The press and America
195460
3 199025
4
Introduction to Mass Communications
197311
5 195610
6
The Press And America : An Interpretative History Of Journalism
19548
7 20197
8
AEJMC: 75 Years in the Making--A History of Organizing for Journalism and Mass Communication Education in the United States. Journalism Monographs Number 104.
19877
9
Reporting and writing the news
19826
10
Reporting the news
19595
11
Maincurrents in mass communications
19864
12
Perspectives on mass communications
19823
13 19712
14 19511
15 19841
16 19641
17 19780
18 19540
19 19790

About Edwin Emery

Edwin Emery is a scholar working on Communication, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (1 paper), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper) and History of Medical Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (110 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (31 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), Sociology and Political Science (94 citations) and Marketing (19 citations). Edwin Emery has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Phillip H. Ault, Kenneth E. Olson, Brent D. Ruben, Kenneth W. Thompson, Syed A. Rahim, Michael J. Emery, Eric A. Havelock, Godwin C. Chu, Paul J. Carter and Judith L. Sobel. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Journal of Marketing, Neurochirurgie, American Journalism and Prentice-Hall, Inc eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact