Edward T. Hellriegel

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Edward T. Hellriegel
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Pharmacology 150
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 61
Replace Philmore Robertson with:
Philmore Robertson United States
Philippe Danjou France
Tomoko Ishizuka Japan
J. M. A. Sitsen Netherlands
Yu‐Li Liu Taiwan
Shinji Matsunaga Japan
Haig Bozigian United States
A. W. Peck United Kingdom
Joseph F. Gardocki United States
Johan Areberg Denmark
Edward T. Hellriegel relative to Philmore Robertson United States Philmore Robertson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Philmore Robertson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward T. Hellriegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward T. Hellriegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward T. Hellriegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward T. Hellriegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward T. Hellriegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward T. Hellriegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward T. Hellriegel. The network helps show where Edward T. Hellriegel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward T. Hellriegel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward T. Hellriegel Line = papers co-authored together Edward T. Hellriegel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003198
2 1996147
3 200979
4 201174
5 200249
6 199745
7 200845
8 200634
9 200934
10 202032
11 200631
12 201531
13 201329
14 199627
15 201026
16 200224
17 202022
18 202121
19 200119
20 200918

About Edward T. Hellriegel

Edward T. Hellriegel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pharmacology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (150 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (179 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (61 citations). Edward T. Hellriegel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Philmore Robertson, Mona Darwish, Mary Kirby, Thorir D. Bjornsson, Walter W. Hauck, Sanjay Arora, Anil P. D’mello, Ronghua Yang, Mary Lou Bond and Michael T. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Therapeutics, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Xenobiotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact