Edward Piper

16 papers receiving 894 citations

Peers

Edward Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Immunology and Allergy 159
  • Physiology 655
  • Immunology 262
  • Emergency Medical Services 80
  • Dermatology 93
Replace John M. Fahrenholz with:
John M. Fahrenholz United States
R. M. Watson Canada
M Radermecker Belgium
Raffaele D’Ippolito Italy
Mariana Fernandes United Kingdom
Susanna Kumlien Georén Sweden
Hitasha Rupani United Kingdom
Takeshi Koshino Japan
Antonio Castagnaro Italy
Chester C. Wood United States
Edward Piper relative to John M. Fahrenholz United States John M. Fahrenholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
John M. Fahrenholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Piper. The network helps show where Edward Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Piper Line = papers co-authored together Edward Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012308
2 2015300
3 2018186
4 201156
5 201523
6 196820
7 201715
8 201612
9 19818
10 20117
11 20125
12 19794
13 19774
14 19771
15 20161
16 20171
17
Computer analysis ofintraluminal pressure records
19680
18 20150

About Edward Piper

Edward Piper is a scholar working on Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 951 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (10 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Mind wandering and attention (2 papers) and Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (159 citations), Physiology (655 citations), Immunology (262 citations), Emergency Medical Services (80 citations) and Dermatology (93 citations). Edward Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christopher E. Brightling, Dewei She, Richard May, Raffaella Faggioni, Néstor A. Molfino, Richard Leigh, Katie Streicher, Pascal Chanez, Stephanie Korn and Paul M. O’Byrne. Their work appears in journals such as European Respiratory Journal, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact