Edward Erwin

36 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Edward Erwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Psychology 208
  • Philosophy 262
  • History and Philosophy of Science 95
  • Clinical Psychology 436
  • General Decision Sciences 14
Replace Philip Rubovits-Seitz with:
Philip Rubovits-Seitz United States
Richard F. Kitchener United States
Wilma Bucci United States
J. R. Kantor United States
Alan Gauld United Kingdom
Michael Jay Diamond United States
Montague Ullman United States
Saül Rosenzweig United States
Arthur H. Auerbach United States
Nancy S. Kim United States
Edward Erwin relative to Philip Rubovits-Seitz United States Philip Rubovits-Seitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Philip Rubovits-Seitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Erwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Erwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Erwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Erwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Erwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Erwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Erwin. The network helps show where Edward Erwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edward Erwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Erwin Line = papers co-authored together Edward Erwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987292
2 1986159
3
Behavior Therapy: Scientific, Philosophical and Moral Foundations
197865
4 200129
5 200328
6
Philosophy and psychotherapy : razing the troubles of the brain
199726
7 198425
8 199924
9 199915
10 198014
11 19809
12 20009
13 20199
14 19929
15 19898
16 19815
17 20174
18 19844
19 19984
20 19963

About Edward Erwin

Edward Erwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Psychology, Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (13 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (10 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (3 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (208 citations), Philosophy (262 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (95 citations), Clinical Psychology (436 citations) and General Decision Sciences (14 citations). Edward Erwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Adolf Grünbaum, Frank Cioffi, Patricia Kitcher, Harvey Siegel, Nuryani Rustaman, Richard Wollheim, Harry Firman, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis, Brian Orend and Robert C. Fuller. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, American Psychologist, Noûs, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact