Edward Champlin
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 5%
Papers in
- Anthropology 18
- Classical Antiquity Studies 18
- Historical and Literary Studies 2
- History 7
- Classical Studies and Legal History 4
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 3
- Co-authors
- Richard Saller (1 shared paper)Alan K. Bowman (2 shared papers)Brent D. Shaw (1 shared paper)Miriam Griffin (1 shared paper)Jonathan Barnes (1 shared paper)Ronald Mellor (1 shared paper)Craige B. Champìon (1 shared paper)Herbert W. Benario (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phoenix (6 papers)The American Journal of Philology (4 papers)The Journal of Roman Studies (4 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Philologus (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edward Champlin
26 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Anthropology 275
- Classics 57
- Archeology 133
- Religious studies 51
- History 73
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Champlin
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Champlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Champlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Champlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Champlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Champlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Champlin. The network helps show where Edward Champlin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edward Champlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 132 | |
| 2 | 1980 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1978 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1974 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 17 | Tiberius the Wise | 2008 | 2 |
| 18 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 2 |
About Edward Champlin
Edward Champlin is a scholar working on Anthropology, History, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (4 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (275 citations), Classics (57 citations), Archeology (133 citations), Religious studies (51 citations) and History (73 citations). Edward Champlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Saller, Alan K. Bowman, Brent D. Shaw, Miriam Griffin, Jonathan Barnes, Ronald Mellor, Craige B. Champìon, Herbert W. Benario, Andrew Lintott and David Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, The American Journal of Philology, The Journal of Roman Studies, The American Historical Review and Philologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.