Edith Botek
Impact in
-
- Nonlinear Optical Materials Research
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
- Fullerene Chemistry and Applications
Papers in
-
- Nonlinear Optical Materials Research 49
-
- Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds 37
- Co-authors
- Benoı̂t Champagne (80 shared papers)Masayoshi Nakano (40 shared papers)Takashi Kubo (30 shared papers)Ryohei Kishi (33 shared papers)Kenji Kamada (29 shared papers)Koji Ohta (29 shared papers)Hideaki Takahashi (23 shared papers)Kizashi Yamaguchi (13 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Edith Botek
104 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.8k
- Organic Chemistry 2.2k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 528
- Materials Chemistry 1.6k
- Spectroscopy 522
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Botek
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Botek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Botek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Botek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Botek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Botek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Botek. The network helps show where Edith Botek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Botek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 305 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 288 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 260 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 184 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 139 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 128 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 100 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 93 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 90 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 89 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 80 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 78 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 76 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 72 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 55 |
About Edith Botek
Edith Botek is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 108 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (49 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (37 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (23 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (21 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (18 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (12 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (11 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.8k citations), Organic Chemistry (2.2k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (528 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.6k citations) and Spectroscopy (522 citations). Edith Botek has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Benoı̂t Champagne, Masayoshi Nakano, Takashi Kubo, Ryohei Kishi, Kenji Kamada, Koji Ohta, Hideaki Takahashi, Kizashi Yamaguchi, Tomoshige Nitta and Akihiro Shimizu. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and International Journal of Quantum Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.