Edith Blackburn

15 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers

Edith Blackburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Physiology 295
  • Periodontics 38
  • Rehabilitation 52
  • Cell Biology 103
  • Oncology 164
Replace Nicolás Tobar with:
Nicolás Tobar Chile
Susan A. Moak United States
Kamalakar C. Nerusu United States
Sanjiban Chakrabarty India
Xin Guo Japan
Katarzyna Barczak Poland
Jianliang Jin China
Guang Wang China
John S. Brand United States
K. Bolsen Germany
Edith Blackburn relative to Nicolás Tobar Chile Nicolás Tobar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Nicolás Tobar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Blackburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Blackburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Blackburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Blackburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Blackburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Blackburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Blackburn. The network helps show where Edith Blackburn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Blackburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Blackburn Line = papers co-authored together Edith Blackburn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2014302
2 199198
3 200458
4 200945
5 199241
6 199536
7 200532
8 199429
9 201123
10 200723
11 201320
12 201018
13 202113
14
[Differential diagnosis of pigmented lesions of the oral cavity].
19843
15
Prevention of hypothermia during anaesthesia.
19942
16 20250

About Edith Blackburn

Edith Blackburn is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 16 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (7 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper) and Oral and gingival health research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (295 citations), Periodontics (38 citations), Rehabilitation (52 citations), Cell Biology (103 citations) and Oncology (164 citations). Edith Blackburn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include William J. Gullick, Robert B. Freedman, Hilary C. Hawkins, R. G. Burns, Dennis E. Lopatin, Anthony Okolo, Andrea Frontini, Jonathan D. Moore, David A. MacIntyre and Malcolm G. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Water Research, Clinical Cancer Research, Endocrinology and American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact