Edith Aldridge

1.6k citations
30 papers · 458 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Edith Aldridge

28 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Edith Aldridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Linguistics and Language 242
  • Language and Linguistics 419
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
  • Cultural Studies 28
  • Artificial Intelligence 105
Replace Susan Pintzuk with:
Susan Pintzuk United Kingdom
Nicholas Sobin United States
Melita Stavrou Greece
Eloise Jelinek United States
Marit Julien Sweden
Irina Nikolaeva United Kingdom
Leon Stassen Netherlands
Denis Creissels France
Werner Abraham Netherlands
Jila Ghomeshi Canada
Edith Aldridge relative to Susan Pintzuk United Kingdom Susan Pintzuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Susan Pintzuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Aldridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Aldridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Aldridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Aldridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Aldridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Aldridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Aldridge. The network helps show where Edith Aldridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Edith Aldridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Aldridge Line = papers co-authored together Edith Aldridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages
2004123
2 200863
3 200747
4 201143
5
Nominalization and WH-movement in Seediq and Tagalog *
200238
6 201116
7 201016
8 200514
9 200312
10 201611
11 20079
12 20178
13 20098
14 20187
15 20137
16 20136
17 20156
18 20134
19 20034
20 20193

About Edith Aldridge

Edith Aldridge is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (27 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (22 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (15 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (7 papers), Language and cultural evolution (4 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (242 citations), Language and Linguistics (419 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (95 citations), Cultural Studies (28 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (105 citations). Edith Aldridge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Yuko Yanagida. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of East Asian Linguistics, Language and Linguistics Compass, Glossa a journal of general linguistics, Lingua and The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact