Eda Gorbis
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 5
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 4
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 2
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 4
- Co-authors
- Karron M. Maidment (3 shared papers)Sanjaya Saxena (2 shared papers)Tanya Vapnik (1 shared paper)Alexander M. Bystritsky (1 shared paper)Deborah L. Ackerman (1 shared paper)Richard M. Rosen (1 shared paper)Noriko Salamon (2 shared papers)Joseph O’Neill (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Psychiatric Research (1 paper)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Aesthetic Nursing (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eda Gorbis
9 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Clinical Psychology 252
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
- Psychiatry and Mental health 81
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Eda Gorbis
This map shows the geographic impact of Eda Gorbis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eda Gorbis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eda Gorbis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eda Gorbis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eda Gorbis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eda Gorbis. The network helps show where Eda Gorbis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Eda Gorbis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 122 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Eda Gorbis
Eda Gorbis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cultural Studies and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (252 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (41 citations). Eda Gorbis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karron M. Maidment, Sanjaya Saxena, Tanya Vapnik, Alexander M. Bystritsky, Deborah L. Ackerman, Richard M. Rosen, Noriko Salamon, Joseph O’Neill, Susanna W. Chang and Sherryl A. Baker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Molecular Psychiatry and Journal of Aesthetic Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.