Ebony Murray

574 citations
15 papers · 351 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ebony Murray

13 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Ebony Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 342
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 190
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 54
  • Neurology 50
Replace Andrea Albonico with:
Andrea Albonico Canada
Angela Gosling United Kingdom
Sarah Cohan United States
Anne Gaule United Kingdom
Thomas Grueter Germany
M. Grueter Germany
Madeleine Pidcock Australia
Marta Picozzi Italy
Ann D. Gathers United States
Rogelio J. Mercado United States
Ebony Murray relative to Andrea Albonico Canada Andrea Albonico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andrea Albonico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ebony Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ebony Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ebony Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ebony Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ebony Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ebony Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ebony Murray. The network helps show where Ebony Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ebony Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ebony Murray Line = papers co-authored together Ebony Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201855
2 201641
3 201940
4 201839
5 201836
6 202034
7 201931
8 202120
9 201920
10 202213
11 201913
12 20208
13 20181
14 20240
15 20240

About Ebony Murray

Ebony Murray is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (15 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Face recognition and analysis (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (3 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (190 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (54 citations) and Neurology (50 citations). Ebony Murray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Bate, Rachel J. Bennetts, Jeremy J. Tree, Nabil Hasshim, Anna K. Bobak, Emma Portch, Peter J. Hills, Charlie D. Frowd, Michael J. Banissy and Nicola Gregory. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, Scientific Reports, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Psychological Assessment and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact