E. Windeisen

26 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

E. Windeisen
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Building and Construction 158
  • Polymers and Plastics 46
  • Biomaterials 37
  • Organic Chemistry 81
  • Biomedical Engineering 108
Replace Grzegorz Cofta with:
Grzegorz Cofta Poland
Mesut Yalçın Türkiye
Won‐Joung Hwang Japan
Alexánder Berrocal Costa Rica
Ingo Mayer Switzerland
Marcos M. González-Peña United Kingdom
Yafang Lei China
Tiina Belt Finland
Dragica Jeremic United States
Mohamed Traoré Spain
E. Windeisen relative to Grzegorz Cofta Poland Grzegorz Cofta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Grzegorz Cofta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Windeisen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Windeisen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Windeisen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Windeisen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Windeisen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Windeisen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Windeisen. The network helps show where E. Windeisen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside E. Windeisen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Windeisen Line = papers co-authored together E. Windeisen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200351
2 200241
3 201229
4 200525
5 200525
6 200623
7 200321
8 200220
9 201714
10 200313
11 201112
12 199511
13 200310
14 19978
15 20048
16 19997
17 20097
18 20117
19 20005
20 20164

About E. Windeisen

E. Windeisen is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Building and Construction, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wood Treatment and Properties (10 papers), Lignin and Wood Chemistry (9 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (2 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (2 papers), Advanced Cellulose Research Studies (2 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (2 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (2 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (158 citations), Polymers and Plastics (46 citations), Biomaterials (37 citations), Organic Chemistry (81 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (108 citations). E. Windeisen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include G. Wegener, Julius Natterer, Klaus Richter, José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones, N. E. Kotelnikova, Claudia Strobel, Falk Liebner, Michael Betz, G. Cerny and Annica Pilgård. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, Wood Science and Technology, Macromolecular Symposia, Carbohydrate Polymers and Amino Acids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact