E. Testa

881 citations
17 papers · 621 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

E. Testa

17 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

E. Testa
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Gastroenterology 48
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 278
  • Oncology 145
  • Surgery 208
  • Cancer Research 51
Replace S. S. Ngoi with:
S. S. Ngoi Singapore
Yutaka Sunose Japan
Hideki Tabara Japan
D Pertsemlidis United States
E. Mari Italy
Richard Sultanian Canada
Charles Ruchti Switzerland
Shinkichi Sato Japan
Jiwang Liang China
Louis‐Joseph Auguste United States
E. Testa relative to S. S. Ngoi Singapore S. S. Ngoi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
S. S. Ngoi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Testa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Testa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Testa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Testa. The network helps show where E. Testa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Testa Line = papers co-authored together E. Testa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200092
2 199791
3 200282
4 200077
5 200873
6 200562
7 200445
8 200628
9 200220
10 200317
11 200515
12
Long-survival in responding patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-docetaxel combination. A multicentre phase II trial.
200412
13 20212
14 20042
15 20041
16 20141
17 20181

About E. Testa

E. Testa is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Hematology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (3 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (1 paper), Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (1 paper), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (1 paper), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (48 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (278 citations), Oncology (145 citations), Surgery (208 citations) and Cancer Research (51 citations). E. Testa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Graziano, Vincenzo Catalano, Stefano Cascinu, Paolo Giordani, Anna Maria Baldelli, Giuseppina Catalano, Daniele Santini, Paolo Alessandroni, Anna Alı̀ and G. Osella. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact