E. Snoeks

2.2k citations
38 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

E. Snoeks

36 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

E. Snoeks
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ceramics and Composites 371
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 732
  • Computational Mechanics 472
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
Replace K. Winer with:
K. Winer United States
W. Fuhs Germany
S. Nakashima Japan
C.W. Pitt United Kingdom
J. Stuke Germany
V. Heera Germany
M. A. Paesler United States
Tatsuro Miyasato Japan
K. Weiser United States
S. Misawa Japan
E. Snoeks relative to K. Winer United States K. Winer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
K. Winer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Snoeks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Snoeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Snoeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Snoeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Snoeks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Snoeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Snoeks. The network helps show where E. Snoeks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Snoeks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Snoeks Line = papers co-authored together E. Snoeks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995202
2 1996168
3 1993160
4 1996145
5 2000132
6 1995114
7 199497
8 199591
9 199379
10 199978
11 200071
12 199767
13 199454
14 199652
15 200147
16 199344
17 199339
18 200137
19 200231
20 199730

About E. Snoeks

E. Snoeks is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Ceramics and Composites and Computational Mechanics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (10 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (8 papers), Glass properties and applications (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (7 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (7 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (7 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (371 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (732 citations), Computational Mechanics (472 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations). E. Snoeks has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Albert Polman, G.N. van den Hoven, Mark L. Brongersma, Ad Lagendijk, Pieter G. Kik, T. van Dillen, M.K. Smit, J.W.M. van Uffelen, Carlos M. van Kats and Alfons van Blaaderen. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Journal of Crystal Growth and Advanced Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact