E. Scherer

524 citations
23 papers · 439 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Scherer

23 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

E. Scherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 221
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 180
  • Aquatic Science 76
  • Ecology 145
  • Pollution 54
Replace Clarence J. Goodnight with:
Clarence J. Goodnight United States
Craig W. Steele United States
Peter H. Johansen Canada
Tammy A. Maldonado United States
S.E. Wendelaar Bonga Netherlands
Elton Pinto Colares Brazil
A. Masoni France
G. J. Farmer Canada
Tobias S. Coe United Kingdom
Andrea Vlaeminck Belgium
E. Scherer relative to Clarence J. Goodnight United States Clarence J. Goodnight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Clarence J. Goodnight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Scherer. The network helps show where E. Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside E. Scherer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Scherer Line = papers co-authored together E. Scherer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199293
2 198555
3 196842
4 199733
5 199123
6 198623
7 199822
8 197522
9 197319
10 197119
11 199612
12 197610
13 199610
14 19939
15 19629
16 19887
17
Analytisch-ökologische Untersuchungen zur Verteilung tierischer Bachbesiedler
19657
18
Zur Methodik experimenteller Fließwasser-Ökologie
19656
19 19916
20 19925

About E. Scherer

E. Scherer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Aquatic Science, Ecology and Water Science and Technology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (8 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (3 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (2 papers) and Amphibian and Reptile Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (221 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (180 citations), Aquatic Science (76 citations), Ecology (145 citations) and Pollution (54 citations). E. Scherer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Richard E. McNicol, E. Dodt, Elaine J. Murkin, S. E. Harrison, Mina Kislalioglu, John H. Gee, Karl Müller, H. Majewski and Marie‐Laure Bégout. Their work appears in journals such as Water Quality Research Journal, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Aquatic Toxicology, Vision Research and Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact