E. Scarcelli
Impact in
- Parasitology top 5%
- Leptospirosis research and findings
- Small Animals top 5%
- Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
- Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Papers in
- Food Science 12
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 10
- Food Safety and Hygiene 4
- Parasitology 11
- Leptospirosis research and findings 9
- Co-authors
- M.E. Genovez (21 shared papers)Rosa Maria Piatti (8 shared papers)Simone Miyashiro (10 shared papers)Adriana Cortéz (3 shared papers)Rodrigo Martins Soares (3 shared papers)Marcos Bryan Heinemann (3 shared papers)Sidnei Miyoshi Sakamoto (2 shared papers)Leonardo José Richtzenhain (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
E. Scarcelli
29 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Parasitology 113
- Small Animals 122
- Food Science 153
- Agronomy and Crop Science 64
- Microbiology 38
Countries citing papers authored by E. Scarcelli
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Scarcelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Scarcelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Scarcelli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Scarcelli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Scarcelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Scarcelli. The network helps show where E. Scarcelli may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Scarcelli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 4 |
About E. Scarcelli
E. Scarcelli is a scholar working on Food Science, Parasitology, Infectious Diseases, Small Animals and Ecology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (10 papers), Leptospirosis research and findings (9 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (7 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (4 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (113 citations), Small Animals (122 citations), Food Science (153 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (64 citations) and Microbiology (38 citations). E. Scarcelli has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Peru and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include M.E. Genovez, Rosa Maria Piatti, Simone Miyashiro, Adriana Cortéz, Rodrigo Martins Soares, Marcos Bryan Heinemann, Sidnei Miyoshi Sakamoto, Leonardo José Richtzenhain, Sílvio Arruda Vasconcellos and Sérgio Santos de Azevêdo. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Microbiology, Australian Veterinary Journal, Animal Reproduction Science, Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia and Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.