E. P. Chock

737 citations
26 papers · 639 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. P. Chock

25 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

E. P. Chock
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Condensed Matter Physics 435
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 285
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 300
  • Ceramics and Composites 34
  • Inorganic Chemistry 68
Replace J. Makovsky with:
J. Makovsky Israel
G. Jéhanno France
Akira Misu Japan
H. Lütgemeier Germany
Georg Michael Kalvius Germany
J. Sierro Switzerland
E. Frikkee Netherlands
K. Fossheim Norway
L. J. Tao United States
Yukio Obata Japan
E. P. Chock relative to J. Makovsky Israel J. Makovsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Makovsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. P. Chock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. P. Chock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. P. Chock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. P. Chock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. P. Chock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. P. Chock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. P. Chock. The network helps show where E. P. Chock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. P. Chock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. P. Chock Line = papers co-authored together E. P. Chock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971100
2 197398
3 197370
4 197456
5 197345
6 197544
7 198137
8 197136
9 197226
10 197720
11 197215
12 197115
13 197813
14 197111
15 197410
16 19759
17 19778
18 19737
19 19784
20
Dynamic behavior of paramagnetic ions and conduction electrons in intermetallic compounds: Gd/sub x/Lu/sub 1-x/Al$sub 2$
19744

About E. P. Chock

E. P. Chock is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (13 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (3 papers) and Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (435 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (285 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (300 citations), Ceramics and Composites (34 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (68 citations). E. P. Chock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include D. Davidov, C. Rettori, R. Orbach, L. J. Tao, R. Orbach, Kazumi Maki, K. Baberschke, Mohamed A. El-Sayed, K. Bärner and R. Braunstein. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Solid State Communications, Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact