E. Mumm

857 citations
19 papers · 213 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

E. Mumm

19 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

E. Mumm
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 126
  • Aerospace Engineering 71
  • Mechanical Engineering 73
  • Ocean Engineering 22
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 25
Replace Lori Shiraishi with:
Lori Shiraishi United States
A. Okon United States
Stephen Johnstone United States
Kim Aaron United States
Qian Xu China
David J. Barnhart United Kingdom
Tong He China
Ge Dong China
Howard D. Curtis United States
Kong Q. Ha United States
E. Mumm relative to Lori Shiraishi United States Lori Shiraishi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Lori Shiraishi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Mumm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Mumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Mumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Mumm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Mumm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Mumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Mumm. The network helps show where E. Mumm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Mumm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Mumm Line = papers co-authored together E. Mumm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200734
2 200331
3 200626
4 200420
5 201318
6
Honeybee Robotics Planetary Drill Systems
200816
7 201014
8 201211
9 201410
10 20105
11 20175
12 20154
13
Honeybee Robotics Sample Acquisition, Transfer and Processing Technologies Enabling Sample Return Missions
20084
14
Development of Autonomous Drills for Planetary Exploration
20063
15 20103
16 20133
17 20153
18 20032
19 20081

About E. Mumm

E. Mumm is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Ocean Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 213 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (10 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (4 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (3 papers), Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems (2 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (2 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers) and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (126 citations), Aerospace Engineering (71 citations), Mechanical Engineering (73 citations), Ocean Engineering (22 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (25 citations). E. Mumm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include G. Paulsen, K. Zacny, Kiel Davis, Paolo Pirjanian, Shane Farritor, Paul S. Schenker, Chris Leger, B. Glass, Michael Garrett and Stephen Gorevan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Field Robotics, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, Autonomous Robots, Earth Moon and Planets and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact