E. Mendes

1.3k citations
28 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

E. Mendes

28 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

E. Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Information Systems 955
  • Human-Computer Interaction 59
  • Software 21
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 18
  • Computer Science Applications 11
Replace John W. Bailey with:
John W. Bailey United States
Mohamed El‐Attar Saudi Arabia
Saurabh Tiwari India
Rafa E. Al-Qutaish Canada
Daniel Galin Israel
Nurie Nurmuliani Australia
Jeff Tian United States
Aaron G. Cass United States
Pär Carlshamre Sweden
Negar Hariri United States
E. Mendes relative to John W. Bailey United States John W. Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
John W. Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Mendes. The network helps show where E. Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside E. Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Mendes Line = papers co-authored together E. Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001103
2 2004100
3 200883
4 201172
5 200567
6 200366
7 200465
8 200258
9 200457
10 200551
11 201050
12 200438
13 200337
14 200234
15 200232
16 200930
17 200324
18 200923
19 201020
20 200917

About E. Mendes

E. Mendes is a scholar working on Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Management Science and Operations Research and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (24 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Web Applications and Data Management (1 paper), Usability and User Interface Design (1 paper), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (955 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (59 citations), Software (21 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (18 citations) and Computer Science Applications (11 citations). E. Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nile Mosley, Steve Counsell, Barbara Ann Kitchenham, Carmine Gravino, Filomena Ferrucci, Federica Sarro, C.M. Triggs, Sergio Di Martino, Chris Lokan and Anna Corazza. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, IEEE Multimedia, IET Software and UCL Discovery (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact