E. M. Pell

1.2k citations
32 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

E. M. Pell

31 papers receiving 870 citations

Peers

E. M. Pell
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Radiation 122
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 429
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 717
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 122
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 59
Replace W. Katz with:
W. Katz United States
I. K. MacKenzie Canada
L.G. Earwaker United Kingdom
D. W. Palmer United Kingdom
L. C. Emerson United States
P. Paradis Canada
J. Tousset France
Yasushi Aoki Japan
R. Parodi Italy
H. Schulte Germany
E. M. Pell relative to W. Katz United States W. Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
W. Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Pell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Pell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Pell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Pell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Pell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Pell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Pell. The network helps show where E. M. Pell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Pell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Pell Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Pell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960214
2 1960102
3 196095
4 195979
5 195756
6 197647
7 195146
8 196545
9 196139
10 195337
11 196036
12 197136
13 195533
14 195730
15 195220
16 195618
17 196117
18 196315
19 195215
20 195712

About E. M. Pell

E. M. Pell is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (12 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (6 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (5 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (4 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (3 papers) and Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (122 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (429 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (717 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (122 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (59 citations). E. M. Pell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include R. N. Hall, R. O. Carlson, D. H. Tomboulian, H. Puxbaum, H. Malissa, Ronald L. Meek, Robert McDonald, R. M. Chrenko, Frank S. Ham and Robert L. Sproull. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, Microchimica Acta and Analytica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact