E. M. Apfelbaum

59 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

E. M. Apfelbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 115
  • Geophysics 195
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 156
  • Biomedical Engineering 425
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 272
Replace Karsten Meier with:
Karsten Meier Germany
J. J. Hurly United States
M. S. Shaw United States
F. B. Canfield United States
R.D. McCarty United States
Dwain E. Diller United States
Daniel Schiff France
R. L. Rusby United Kingdom
A. Holz Germany
K.W. Taconis Netherlands
E. M. Apfelbaum relative to Karsten Meier Germany Karsten Meier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Karsten Meier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Apfelbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Apfelbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Apfelbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Apfelbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Apfelbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Apfelbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Apfelbaum. The network helps show where E. M. Apfelbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Apfelbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Apfelbaum Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Apfelbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200971
2 200944
3 200639
4 201532
5 200829
6 201125
7 201625
8 200825
9 201322
10 201222
11 200521
12 201620
13 200820
14 201319
15 201519
16 201518
17 201118
18 200618
19 201018
20 201015

About E. M. Apfelbaum

E. M. Apfelbaum is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 64 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (29 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (24 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (20 papers), Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys (15 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (11 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (9 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (8 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (115 citations), Geophysics (195 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (156 citations), Biomedical Engineering (425 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (272 citations). E. M. Apfelbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include V. S. Vorob’ev, G. A. Martynov, M Apfelbaum, М. Ф. Иванов, A. G. Khrapak, B. A. Klumov, G. E. Morfill and В. Е. Фортов. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Physics of Plasmas, High Temperature, Journal of Molecular Liquids and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact