E. L. Stone

2.8k citations
82 papers · 2.2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

E. L. Stone

80 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

E. L. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 927
  • Soil Science 585
  • Global and Planetary Change 692
  • Insect Science 249
  • Ecology 485
Replace N. Lust with:
N. Lust Belgium
D. C. Malcolm United Kingdom
Jacques J. Ranger France
Glenn D. Mroz United States
Claude Camiré Canada
Eino Mälkönen Finland
Agneta H. Plamboeck Sweden
Nobuhiro Kaneko Japan
P. D. Putwain United Kingdom
David E. Reichle United States
E. L. Stone relative to N. Lust Belgium N. Lust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. Lust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Stone. The network helps show where E. L. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. L. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. L. Stone Line = papers co-authored together E. L. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991432
2 1986187
3 1978145
4 196688
5 199085
6 197581
7 198473
8 196860
9 199254
10 198052
11 198349
12 198448
13 197746
14 199341
15 195437
16 197937
17 196936
18 196533
19 198131
20 199129

About E. L. Stone

E. L. Stone is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seedling growth and survival studies (22 papers), Forest ecology and management (19 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (5 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (5 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (927 citations), Soil Science (585 citations), Global and Planetary Change (692 citations), Insect Science (249 citations) and Ecology (485 citations). E. L. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nepal and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include P. J. Kalisz, W. W. McFee, Susan W. Beatty, V. R. Timmer, W.L. Robison, Richard F. Fisher, Hugh G. Gauch, Gisela Will, T Hamilton and Eric J. Jokela. Their work appears in journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, Forest Science, Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management and Journal of Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact