E. L. Piper

1.0k citations
34 papers · 757 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

E. L. Piper

34 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

E. L. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 583
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 213
  • Environmental Chemistry 202
  • Molecular Biology 298
  • Animal Science and Zoology 35
Replace P.M. Zavos with:
P.M. Zavos United States
D. L. Cross United States
B. Kirch United States
P. A. Eichen United States
H. Alm Germany
T. M. Sutherland United States
RF Thornton Australia
Jai‐Jun Choung United Kingdom
R. Dean United States
I. Pašakinskienė Lithuania
E. L. Piper relative to P.M. Zavos United States P.M. Zavos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
P.M. Zavos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Piper. The network helps show where E. L. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. L. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. L. Piper Line = papers co-authored together E. L. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199677
2 200476
3 200159
4 199557
5 200353
6 198749
7 199948
8 200132
9 198729
10 200427
11 198227
12 199622
13 196820
14 200119
15 197919
16 199817
17 199413
18 198713
19 199812
20 199911

About E. L. Piper

E. L. Piper is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Environmental Chemistry and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 34 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and fungal interactions (23 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (13 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (9 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (8 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (6 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (4 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers) and Soybean genetics and cultivation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (583 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (213 citations), Environmental Chemistry (202 citations), Molecular Biology (298 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (35 citations). E. L. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Donald E. Spiers, Z. B. Johnson, L. B. Daniels, Brian Larson, Charles P. West, Lowell P. Bush, A.L. Goetsch, Sandra R. Stokes, K. W. Beers and Amy Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Biology of Reproduction, Domestic Animal Endocrinology and jpa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact