E. Knapp

417 citations
17 papers · 367 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant Virus Research Studies 14
    • Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 2
    • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 2
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 7
    • Plant Reproductive Biology 3

E. Knapp

17 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

E. Knapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Endocrinology 60
  • Horticulture 10
  • Biotechnology 76
  • Plant Science 284
  • Molecular Biology 211
Replace Robert de Feyter with:
Robert de Feyter Australia
Yoichi Kawazu Japan
Pere Puigdomènech Spain
Hanspeter Schöb Switzerland
Camilla Julie Kørner United States
Luisa López-Ochoa Mexico
Natalia Inés Almasia Argentina
Paula Maria Moreira Martins Brazil
Cristiano Caixeta Nunes United States
V. Hanzer Austria
E. Knapp relative to Robert de Feyter Australia Robert de Feyter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Robert de Feyter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Knapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Knapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Knapp. The network helps show where E. Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Knapp Line = papers co-authored together E. Knapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1992117
2 199546
3 199536
4 200834
5 200128
6 200525
7 201221
8 200120
9 20077
10 19987
11 19957
12 19976
13 19975
14 19923
15 19953
16 19941
17 20131

About E. Knapp

E. Knapp is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Ecology and Cell Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (14 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (7 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (5 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (2 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (60 citations), Horticulture (10 citations), Biotechnology (76 citations), Plant Science (284 citations) and Molecular Biology (211 citations). E. Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Dennis J. Lewandowski, V. Hanzer, Artur da Câmara Machado, H. Katinger, Diethard Mattanovich, Herta Steinkellner, Hermann Katinger, Margit Laimer, Ferdinand Regner and B. Weiß. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Molecular Plant Pathology, Journal of Virology, BioTechniques and Plant Cell Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact