E. Jin

908 citations
21 papers · 188 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

E. Jin

19 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

E. Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 78
  • Media Technology 35
  • Social Psychology 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 96
Replace Todd Newman with:
Todd Newman United States
Philippe Colantoni France
Ellen C. Carter United States
Iván Marín‐Franch United States
Peter G. Engeldrum United States
Lisa Reniff United States
Masataka Sawayama Japan
Ana Radonjić United States
Pei‐Li Sun Taiwan
Ariella V. Popple United States
E. Jin relative to Todd Newman United States Todd Newman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Todd Newman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Jin. The network helps show where E. Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Jin Line = papers co-authored together E. Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199673
2 200927
3
The Development of A Color Visual Difference Model (CVDM).
199815
4 200512
5 200912
6 20098
7 20178
8 20105
9 20105
10 20084
11 20094
12 20053
13 20093
14 20112
15 20082
16
A Groundtruth Database for Testing Objective Metrics for Image Difference.
20031
17 20181
18 20161
19
Advanced Fast Reactor - 100 - Design Overview
20151
20 20091

About E. Jin

E. Jin is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Media Technology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 188 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (12 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (5 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (3 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (3 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations), Media Technology (35 citations), Social Psychology (71 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (96 citations). E. Jin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steven K. Shevell, Jon S. McElvain, J. Miller, Scott Campbell, John Newell, Brian W. Keelan, Xiaofan Feng, Michael E. Miller, Junqing Chen and Ying Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Nuclear Energy, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Journal of Electronic Imaging, Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE and Electronic Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact