E. Janik

1.3k citations
102 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

E. Janik

99 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

E. Janik
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 590
  • Materials Chemistry 645
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 602
  • Condensed Matter Physics 114
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 137
Replace R. B. Bylsma with:
R. B. Bylsma United States
C. Didiot France
Masakuni Okamoto Japan
Patrik Ščajev Lithuania
A. M. Witowski Poland
P. Scharoch Poland
M. Yazawa Japan
Kai‐Felix Braun Germany
A. A. Tonkikh Russia
Simon M.‐M. Dubois Belgium
E. Janik relative to R. B. Bylsma United States R. B. Bylsma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
R. B. Bylsma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Janik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Janik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Janik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Janik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Janik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Janik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Janik. The network helps show where E. Janik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Janik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Janik Line = papers co-authored together E. Janik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014113
2 200668
3 200467
4 198359
5 199556
6 200750
7 200241
8 198131
9 200928
10 200518
11 200618
12 201218
13 199616
14 200516
15 200115
16 200514
17 200014
18 199914
19 199414
20 199914

About E. Janik

E. Janik is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (66 papers), Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (45 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (33 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (33 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (18 papers), ZnO doping and properties (17 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (16 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (590 citations), Materials Chemistry (645 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (602 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (114 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (137 citations). E. Janik has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include T. Wójtowicz, E. Dynowska, R. Triboulet, R.J. Iwanowski, J. Kossut, M.H. Heinonen, G. Karczewski, W. Szuszkiewicz, S. Kret and P. Kossacki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Crystal Growth, physica status solidi (b), Thin Solid Films, Applied Physics Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact