E. Jane Candy

19 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers

E. Jane Candy
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 160
  • Small Animals 157
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 243
  • Developmental Biology 18
  • Ecology 159
Replace Blanca Jimeno with:
Blanca Jimeno Netherlands
A. Rees United Kingdom
Brenna M. G. Gormally United States
P Péczely Hungary
Kathleen M. O’Reilly United States
Graham D. Fairhurst Canada
Samrrah A. Raouf United States
Jamie M. Cornelius United States
Scott Davies United States
Lindsay J. Henderson United Kingdom
E. Jane Candy relative to Blanca Jimeno Netherlands Blanca Jimeno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
Blanca Jimeno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Jane Candy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Jane Candy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Jane Candy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Jane Candy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Jane Candy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Jane Candy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Jane Candy. The network helps show where E. Jane Candy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside E. Jane Candy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Jane Candy Line = papers co-authored together E. Jane Candy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200294
2 200993
3 200767
4 200660
5 200541
6 201030
7 200829
8 200820
9 199413
10 201013
11 201613
12 200012
13 200512
14 20169
15 20046
16 20123
17 20133
18 20162
19 20202
20 20191

About E. Jane Candy

E. Jane Candy is a scholar working on Small Animals, Behavioral Neuroscience, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Developmental Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education (2 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (160 citations), Small Animals (157 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (243 citations), Developmental Biology (18 citations) and Ecology (159 citations). E. Jane Candy has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John F. Cockrem, Murray Alan Potter, D. Paul Barrett, Naomi E. Langmore, Graeme A. Taylor, N. J. Adams, Kerry Hull, D.G. Satterlee, Heather V. Simpson and Dianne H. Brunton. Their work appears in journals such as General and Comparative Endocrinology, Emu - Austral Ornithology, Domestic Animal Endocrinology, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology and Marine Pollution Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact