E. Infeld

2.5k citations
119 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

E. Infeld

110 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

E. Infeld
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Mathematical Physics 249
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 383
  • Modeling and Simulation 85
Replace Nobuo Yajima with:
Nobuo Yajima Japan
Masayoshi Tajiri Japan
E. A. Kuznetsov Russia
Flora Y. F. Chu United States
V.G. Makhankov Russia
V. I. Karpman Russia
Kazuhiro Nozaki Japan
G. M. Zaslavskiĭ Russia
Hedley Morris United States
G. L. Lamb United States
E. Infeld relative to Nobuo Yajima Japan Nobuo Yajima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Nobuo Yajima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Infeld

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Infeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Infeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Infeld more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Infeld

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Infeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Infeld. The network helps show where E. Infeld may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside E. Infeld, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Infeld Line = papers co-authored together E. Infeld links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000413
2 1985109
3 200589
4 198180
5 199264
6 198960
7 197357
8 197253
9 198952
10 200448
11 201446
12 200843
13 199541
14 199641
15 201036
16 198733
17 197931
18 199429
19 199229
20 200627

About E. Infeld

E. Infeld is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 119 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Photonic Systems (38 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (30 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (20 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (18 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (16 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Mathematical Physics (249 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (383 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (85 citations). E. Infeld has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include George Rowlands, G. Rowlands, Marek Trippenbach, Michał Matuszewski, P. Frycz, Boris A. Malomed, A. M. Grundland, P. Rozmej, Anna Karczewska and S. Torvén. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plasma Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Physics Letters A and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact