E. G. Lean

718 citations
31 papers · 606 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. G. Lean

29 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

E. G. Lean
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 409
  • Biomedical Engineering 405
  • Mechanics of Materials 172
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 306
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 17
Replace P.V. Wright with:
P.V. Wright United States
Halvor Skeie Norway
B.R. McAvoy United States
J.M. Hodé France
Yu-Po Wong Japan
Natalya Naumenko Russia
Kunihiko Washio Japan
G. Martin Germany
Johanna Meltaus Finland
Richard B. Gold United States
E. G. Lean relative to P.V. Wright United States P.V. Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
P.V. Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. G. Lean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. G. Lean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. G. Lean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. G. Lean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. G. Lean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. G. Lean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. G. Lean. The network helps show where E. G. Lean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside E. G. Lean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. G. Lean Line = papers co-authored together E. G. Lean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197179
2 197067
3 197066
4 197650
5 197148
6 196947
7 196747
8 197042
9 196930
10 196728
11 197415
12 197615
13 197313
14 197911
15 197510
16 19668
17 19737
18 19704
19 19813
20 19812

About E. G. Lean

E. G. Lean is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Oceanography, having authored 31 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (18 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (8 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (7 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (6 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (5 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (409 citations), Biomedical Engineering (405 citations), Mechanics of Materials (172 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (306 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (17 citations). E. G. Lean has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. Kuhn, P. F. Heidrich, H. J. Shaw, James M. White, Christopher D. W. Wilkinson, C. F. Quate, Alec Nigel Broers, Michael Hatzakis, John H. Collins and C.D.W. Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Proceedings of the IEEE, Electronics Letters, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and IBM Journal of Research and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact