E. G. Lean

717 citations
33 papers · 520 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. G. Lean

30 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

E. G. Lean
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 344
  • Biomedical Engineering 343
  • Mechanics of Materials 159
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 261
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 12
Replace Yu-Po Wong with:
Yu-Po Wong Japan
Natalya Naumenko Russia
J. Kaitila Germany
G. Martin Germany
Kunihiko Washio Japan
Weijia Yang United Kingdom
E. Bigler France
Johanna Meltaus Finland
T. Pfafman United States
Anant Chimmalgi United States
E. G. Lean relative to Yu-Po Wong Japan Yu-Po Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Yu-Po Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. G. Lean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. G. Lean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. G. Lean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. G. Lean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. G. Lean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. G. Lean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. G. Lean. The network helps show where E. G. Lean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside E. G. Lean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. G. Lean Line = papers co-authored together E. G. Lean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197166
2 197063
3 197057
4 197149
5 197040
6 197640
7 196740
8 196937
9 196927
10 196720
11 197911
12 197510
13 197410
14 197610
15 19668
16 19737
17 19703
18 19813
19 19762
20 19692

About E. G. Lean

E. G. Lean is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Oceanography, having authored 33 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (18 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (9 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (8 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (6 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (6 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (5 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (344 citations), Biomedical Engineering (343 citations), Mechanics of Materials (159 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (261 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (12 citations). E. G. Lean has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. Kuhn, P. F. Heidrich, H. J. Shaw, J. M. White, C. D. W. Wilkinson, A. N. Broers, C. F. Quate, M. Hatzakis, John H. Collins and C.D.W. Wilkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Proceedings of the IEEE and Electronics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact