E. Ford
Impact in
-
- Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
- Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
- Plant and animal studies
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution 4
- Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies 2
- Fossil Insects in Amber 1
- Genetics 3
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 3
- Co-authors
- Audun Dahl (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cognitive Development (1 paper)The Coleopterists Bulletin (1 paper)ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2 papers)Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- TürkiyeUnited States
In The Last Decade
E. Ford
5 papers receiving 8 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 7
- Insect Science 4
- Paleontology 2
- Ecology 6
- Geography, Planning and Development 1
Countries citing papers authored by E. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Ford. The network helps show where E. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside E. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The genus Stelidota Erichson in North America: a new species from Florida, new synonymy and lectotype designations (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). | 1996 | 5 |
| 2 | SOME NEW ANOBIIDS (Coleoptera) FROM THE PAPUAN SUBREGION1 | 1970 | 1 |
| 3 | Birds of Prey | 1975 | 1 |
| 4 | The Endemic Genus Cillaeopeplus of Hawaii, with Descriptions of Two New Species (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) | 1957 | 1 |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | A New Holcobius from Oahu (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) | 1954 | 1 |
| 7 | Instagram Perceptions and Coherent Impressions: An Exploratory Study Regarding Perceptions of Personal Brands | 2017 | 0 |
About E. Ford
E. Ford is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Communication, Paleontology and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 10 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (4 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (3 papers), Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies (2 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (1 paper), Social and Educational Sciences (1 paper), Media Studies and Communication (1 paper), Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper) and Marketing and Advertising Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (7 citations), Insect Science (4 citations), Paleontology (2 citations), Ecology (6 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (1 citation). E. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye and United States. Frequent co-authors include Audun Dahl. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Development, The Coleopterists Bulletin, ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) and Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.