E. Denève
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Papers in
- Co-authors
- David Nocca (14 shared papers)Sabine Riethdorf (2 shared papers)Catherine Alix‐Panabières (2 shared papers)Thierry Maudelondé (2 shared papers)Amandine Coffy (2 shared papers)Klaus Pantel (2 shared papers)Jean-Pierre Vendrell (1 shared paper)Jean‐Michel Fabre (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Chemistry (2 papers)Surgical Endoscopy (2 papers)Obesity Surgery (2 papers)Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger (1 paper)Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
E. Denève
16 papers receiving 698 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Cancer Research 221
- Oncology 331
- Surgery 285
- Biotechnology 31
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 74
Countries citing papers authored by E. Denève
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Denève's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Denève with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Denève more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Denève
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Denève. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Denève. The network helps show where E. Denève may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Denève, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 205 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 188 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 159 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 1 |
About E. Denève
E. Denève is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Gastroenterology, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers), Hernia repair and management (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (221 citations), Oncology (331 citations), Surgery (285 citations), Biotechnology (31 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (74 citations). E. Denève has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Nocca, Sabine Riethdorf, Catherine Alix‐Panabières, Thierry Maudelondé, Amandine Coffy, Klaus Pantel, Jean-Pierre Vendrell, Jean‐Michel Fabre, José Ramos and Jean‐Pierre Daurès. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, Surgical Endoscopy, Obesity Surgery, Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger and Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.