E. D'Amico

26 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

E. D'Amico
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Applied Psychology 55
  • Rehabilitation 21
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Radiation 24
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 35
Replace Akihiko Miura with:
Akihiko Miura Japan
J. Purcell United States
Matteo Zanetti Italy
Trong‐Kha Truong United States
D. Mack United States
Tatsuya Takeuchi Japan
W. Westphal Germany
Arthur Funkhouser Switzerland
Youngmin Shin South Korea
Christoph Stefan Aigner Germany
E. D'Amico relative to Akihiko Miura Japan Akihiko Miura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.3×
Akihiko Miura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. D'Amico

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. D'Amico's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. D'Amico with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. D'Amico more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. D'Amico

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. D'Amico. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. D'Amico. The network helps show where E. D'Amico may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. D'Amico, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. D'Amico Line = papers co-authored together E. D'Amico links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018102
2 201946
3 200332
4 197931
5 201727
6 198121
7 200213
8 200512
9 20168
10 19805
11 20064
12 19774
13 19834
14 20013
15 20043
16
The SMILING project : prevention of falls by a mechatronic training device
20093
17
Wire Scanner News in the CERN-SPS
19892
18 20162
19 19802
20 20162

About E. D'Amico

E. D'Amico is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (12 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (7 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (4 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (55 citations), Rehabilitation (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations), Radiation (24 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (35 citations). E. D'Amico has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Bosser, R. Bossart, Enrico Gratton, J. Mann, Maria Bulgheroni, Jussi Seppälä, Matti Isohanni, Iluminada Corripio, Jouko Miettunen and Eva Grasa. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, Animal Cognition and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact