J. Purcell

49 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

J. Purcell
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Condensed Matter Physics 96
  • General Decision Sciences 12
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Aerospace Engineering 67
  • Biomedical Engineering 107
Replace Takahiro Doi with:
Takahiro Doi Japan
Youngmin Shin South Korea
Eckhard Hempel Germany
H. A. Peterson United States
Kôichi Yokosawa Japan
Masahiro Yamamoto Japan
Lang Qin China
M. van der Burgt United Kingdom
Thorsten Schwarz Germany
M. Linder Netherlands
J. Purcell relative to Takahiro Doi Japan Takahiro Doi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Takahiro Doi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Purcell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Purcell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Purcell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Purcell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Purcell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Purcell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Purcell. The network helps show where J. Purcell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Purcell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Purcell Line = papers co-authored together J. Purcell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201831
2 201819
3 198619
4 202317
5 198717
6 198117
7 201916
8 197814
9 202114
10 197712
11 202111
12
Design improvements and cost reductions for a 5000 MWh superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage plant
198510
13 19779
14 19859
15 19818
16 20237
17 19607
18 20187
19 19677
20 19766

About J. Purcell

J. Purcell is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (25 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (17 papers), Frequency Control in Power Systems (8 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (8 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (5 papers) and Microgrid Control and Optimization (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (96 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations), Aerospace Engineering (67 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (107 citations). J. Purcell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Joshua W. Brown, William P. Hetrick, Takashi Nakamura, Brian F. O’Donnell, Rena Fukunaga, Dae‐Jin Kim, M.A. Hilal, June Gruber, Susan Schoenung and W.V. Hassenzahl. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Review of Scientific Instruments, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of Applied Physics and IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact