E. Brecht

890 citations
36 papers · 753 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. Brecht

35 papers receiving 729 citations

Peers

E. Brecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Condensed Matter Physics 303
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 193
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 137
  • Ecology 192
  • Environmental Chemistry 46
Replace Joachim Schott with:
Joachim Schott Germany
Tao Zou China
A. S. Semenova Russia
Hideo Fujiki Japan
Chunhong Li China
Wim Star Netherlands
Daisuke Tahara Japan
Mikael Björk Sweden
Beichen Wang China
Yanhui Hou China
E. Brecht relative to Joachim Schott Germany Joachim Schott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Joachim Schott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Brecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Brecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Brecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Brecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Brecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Brecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Brecht. The network helps show where E. Brecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Brecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Brecht Line = papers co-authored together E. Brecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006183
2 2008117
3 199897
4 199750
5 200642
6 199638
7 199423
8 199418
9 199117
10 199817
11 199515
12 199114
13 199714
14 200710
15 199610
16 201210
17 19929
18 19989
19 19977
20 19946

About E. Brecht

E. Brecht is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 36 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (28 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (10 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (10 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (5 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (4 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (4 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (303 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (193 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (137 citations), Ecology (192 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (46 citations). E. Brecht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include John W. Peters, Wolfgang W. Schmahl, Anne‐Soisig Steunou, Mary M. Bateson, Michael Kühl, Devaki Bhaya, David M. Ward, Arthur Grossman, Th. Wolf and N.H. Andersen. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Thin Solid Films, Journal of Crystal Growth and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact