D.S. Chi

1.8k citations
44 papers · 1.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

D.S. Chi

42 papers receiving 1.3k citations

D.S. Chi's Hit Papers

What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)? 2006 · 488 citations
4880+6+13Years since publication100200300400

Peers

D.S. Chi
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Reproductive Medicine 754
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 411
  • Infectious Diseases 164
  • Surgery 303
  • Immunology 133
Replace Neelam B. Kumar with:
Neelam B. Kumar United States
Jeng-Gwang Hsiu United States
Hazel Gore United States
G Foglia Italy
Angus McIndoe United Kingdom
Jean‐Jacques Baldauf France
Johan Siewiera France
S. Ahrons Denmark
Mamiko Onuki Japan
Reagan Jw United States
D.S. Chi relative to Neelam B. Kumar United States Neelam B. Kumar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Neelam B. Kumar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by D.S. Chi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.S. Chi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.S. Chi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.S. Chi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.S. Chi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.S. Chi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.S. Chi. The network helps show where D.S. Chi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside D.S. Chi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with D.S. Chi Line = papers co-authored together D.S. Chi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)?
Hit paper breakdown →
2006488
2 1992226
3 201286
4 201082
5 199775
6 200769
7 201761
8 199953
9 201146
10 201041
11 200928
12 201325
13 201319
14 201616
15 201214
16 20143
17 20153
18 20163
19 20193
20 20113

About D.S. Chi

D.S. Chi is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (22 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (15 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (754 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (411 citations), Infectious Diseases (164 citations), Surgery (303 citations) and Immunology (133 citations). D.S. Chi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include R.R. Barakat, Nadeem R. Abu‐Rustum, Jae Huh, Yukio Sonoda, Martee L. Hensley, Douglas A. Levine, Lisa B. Haddad, J. Lang, Eric Eisenhauer and Mario M. Leitão. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Scientific Reports, Journal of Clinical Oncology and The Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact