Drew Dawson∥

14.9k citations
228 papers · 10.3k · h-index 57

Impact in

Papers in

Drew Dawson∥

225 papers receiving 9.7k citations

Peers

Drew Dawson∥
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 6.2k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 3.1k
  • Occupational Therapy 1.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.5k
  • Social Psychology 2.2k
Replace Simon Folkard with:
Simon Folkard United Kingdom
Shantha M. W. Rajaratnam Australia
Hans P. A. Van Dongen United States
Göran Kecklund Sweden
Thomas J. Balkin United States
Pierre Philip France
Torbjörn Åkerstedt Sweden
Mikko Härmä Finland
Bjørn Bjorvatn Norway
Mark E. Howard Australia
Drew Dawson∥ relative to Simon Folkard United Kingdom Simon Folkard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Simon Folkard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Drew Dawson∥

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Dawson∥'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Dawson∥ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Dawson∥ more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Dawson∥

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Dawson∥. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Dawson∥. The network helps show where Drew Dawson∥ may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Drew Dawson∥, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Drew Dawson∥ Line = papers co-authored together Drew Dawson∥ links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 228 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997384
2 2000283
3 2004266
4 1993258
5 2005250
6 2005238
7 1993218
8 1999181
9 2010177
10 2010158
11 1990156
12 2013153
13 2004149
14 2014149
15 1991144
16 2006139
17 1997131
18 2006124
19 1995124
20 1996123

About Drew Dawson∥

Drew Dawson∥ is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Occupational Therapy, having authored 228 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (128 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (74 papers), Sleep and related disorders (61 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (54 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (44 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (33 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (23 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (6.2k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (3.1k citations), Occupational Therapy (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.5k citations) and Social Psychology (2.2k citations). Drew Dawson∥ has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Lamond, Gregory D. Roach, Jillian Dorrian, Cameron J. van den Heuvel, Scott S. Campbell, Sally A. Ferguson, Kurt Lushington, David J. Kennaway, Adam Fletcher and Kirsty McCulloch. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, SLEEP, Accident Analysis & Prevention, Applied Ergonomics and Sleep Medicine Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact